[Disclaimer: We are not accountants, lawyers, or financial advisors, so please consult your own team of professionals about the topics covered in this article.]
When you’re investing in real estate, certain tax strategies can help you reduce your taxable income significantly. One such strategy involves achieving Real Estate Professional Status (REPS), using the short-term rental tax loophole, or qualifying for the medical practice tax loophole. These methods allow real estate investors to write off losses from rental properties against active income, such as your W2 salary. However, a key requirement to access these benefits is meeting a specific level of material participation—a rule that ensures you are actively involved in the management and operations of your properties.
In many cases, real estate investors struggle to meet the material participation hours for a single property, but there’s a strategy known as the grouping election that can help. While this option can open the door to the tax benefits mentioned above, it does come with some downside that you should understand before making the leap.
What is Grouping Election and How Does It Work?
The grouping election allows you to combine the hours you spend on multiple rental properties to meet the IRS’s material participation requirement. This is a powerful tool for people trying to meet the 500-hour material participation test (one of the seven material participation tests) but can’t hit the target with just one property.
Let’s consider an example. Say you own four short-term rental properties, but none of them alone would qualify you for material participation. You’re aiming to hit the 500-hour mark to take advantage of tax breaks. Here’s how your hours break down:
- Property 1: 25 hours
- Property 2: 50 hours
- Property 3: 100 hours
- Property 4: 350 hours
With only one property, you wouldn’t meet the test. However, by using the grouping election, you can combine the hours across all four properties, bringing your total to 525 hours, which exceeds the 500-hour requirement. This would allow you to qualify as materially participating, meaning you can now use the tax benefits that come with real estate professional status or the short-term rental tax loophole.
But here’s the catch—while this strategy can help you qualify for tax breaks right now, it creates some complications down the road, especially when it comes to suspended passive losses.
The Downside: Suspended Passive Losses and Grouping Election
When you own a rental property, you may experience what’s known as suspended passive losses. These are losses you weren’t able to deduct in previous years, often because you didn’t meet the material participation requirements or didn’t have enough passive income to offset them. Ordinarily, when you sell a property, you can use these suspended passive losses to offset not just passive income but also active income and capital gains.
However, once you group your properties under the grouping election, those suspended passive losses are locked into the group. This means you can’t access those losses from just one property until you sell all the properties in the group.
Let’s return to the example above. Say they bought Property 1 ten years ago, and over that time, it has accumulated $250,000 in suspended passive losses. These losses have built up because you didn’t meet the material participation tests in previous years, and you didn’t have enough passive gains to offset the losses.
Now, by grouping this property with the other three rentals to qualify for the 500-hour test, you are inadvertently locking away those losses. If you decide to sell Property 1, even though it has $250,000 in losses attached to it, you wouldn’t be able to use those losses to offset the income from the sale or any other active income, unless you sell the entire group of properties.
Why Is This a Problem?
Without the grouping election, selling a property with suspended passive losses would allow you to use those losses to offset income, potentially saving you tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes. But once properties are grouped, you lose this flexibility.
Let’s say you sell Property 1 for a significant profit, and you’re hoping to use that $250,000 in suspended losses to offset the capital gains from the sale. You might be shocked to discover that they can’t use any of those losses because Property 1 is part of a grouped election. Those losses are tied to the entire group, meaning the only way to unlock them is to sell all four properties. Until then, the suspended losses remain stuck, effectively nullifying a massive tax benefit you’ve been carrying for years.
Weighing the Pros and Cons of Grouping Election
The grouping election can be a great tool for real estate investors who need to meet the IRS’s material participation requirements to access tax benefits. It’s particularly useful when you have multiple properties but can’t meet the hours requirement on just one.
However, the downside is important to consider. Once you make the election, you can’t use suspended passive losses from any one property until you sell the entire group. If you have substantial losses on an older property, this can create a big tax disadvantage in the future, limiting your ability to offset income and reduce your tax burden when you sell individual properties.
As with any tax strategy, it’s important to consider both the short-term benefits and the long-term implications. Grouping properties might help you qualify for material participation today, but it could come back to bite you later when you’re looking to cash in on those suspended passive losses.
Before making a grouping election, be sure to consult with a tax professional to weigh the pros and cons for your specific situation. Click here if you would like to be connected to one of our preferred CPAs.
Download Your First $100k Year – Real Estate Blueprint Guide
